On 01/14/2010 08:28 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
rgheck<rgh...@bobjweil.com> writes:
On 01/14/2010 03:41 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Then the unicodesymbols replacement definition
0x2014 "\\textemdash" "" "" # EM DASH
is wrong.
We could consider
0x2013 "--" "" "" # EN DASH
0x2014 "---" "" "" # EM DASH
but I did not check for negative side effects.
Correct: You get the same problem. Anyone else have a view about this?
What is the problem with those two examples? That \textemdash behaves
too well and does not reproduce the bug with 0x2014?
I made a file similar to the other one, with \textemdash in ERT where I
otherwise had --- or the Unicode glyph. The LaTeX export had the same
problems---no ability to break the line---as with the Unicode glyph.
rh
