Le 9 déc. 09 à 09:26, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This commit is obviously correct but Vincent reported something
strange with forwardInset(), in that this will jump over portion
of the document instead of merely poping out of the current inset.
Or maybe it is just that the method name is misleading? In this
case, I would rename it to nextInset().
Yes. I planned to take a look at this, but I cannot find the
discussion anymore. Where was it?
In the thread "[patch] Spellchecker Bugs"
I see it now. Actually, forwardInset does not iterate inside math
insets, it only looks at insets that are inside text
editor. So Vincents patch is very correct with this semantics. We
could of course change that, but going to each and
every inset of math stuff is very boring (everything is an inset) and
time consuming. I think we do not want that in
99% of the cases.
JMarc
