Alex Fernandez wrote: > > Then I misunderstood, probably because your statement was part of a response > > to Richard talking about trunk and my approach (look at the text I quoted). > > Richard was talking about 1.7, but unfortunately we cannot be sure > that it will be ready for the 1.7 timeframe either. I'm an outsider
timeframe of 1.7 is partly defined by html code finished, unless its completely abandoned... > and I don't really know if trunk is going to become 1.7 or 2.0; if it > works as I understand, whatever is ready for 1.7 is forked for 1.7, > and the rest remains in trunk until it is ready. So speaking about 1.7 > is not the same as speaking about trunk, right? 1.7 equals 2.0, we decided to change the version number, in other words forget about 2.0. trunk is what is now under development and happen to be 1.7 one day. pavel
