Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Granted. IIRC date was a "proof of concept" for the External inset. It could > be removed, if we converted existing occurrences to whatever its successor is.
we do have successor? pavel
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Granted. IIRC date was a "proof of concept" for the External inset. It could > be removed, if we converted existing occurrences to whatever its successor is.
we do have successor? pavel