On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 07:35:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 07:24:55PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 07:18:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 06:35:55PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 05:59:50PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > > > > > > Jean-Marc, maybe autotools should be revised such that to not add the > > > > > Qt dirs to the include path, in order to avoid the slip of Qt code in > > > > > liblyxsupport. > > > > > > > > I meant liblyxcore. I did that now. > > > > > > I thought we basically agreed not to discriminate Qt anymore? > > > > I don't know who you are meaning by "we". > > The last Developers Meeting. > > See http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXMeeting2008, "Political Decisions".
Sorry, was missing that. I only read the mailing list (or try to) and don't have time to dig around. > > Nobody told me that now Qt can infest everything :) > > I guess nobody told you that boost can infest everything as well, > and it's still ok to use... I think that only boost::filesystem was giving problems, and it seems that Qt is not any better in this camp. I am facing really strange problems with Qt 4.5.1 as regards file handling on Cygwin. Never seen something similar before. And I know that Qt 4.5.1 is the culprit, because linking to Qt 4.2.3, the problems vanish. It's a pity, because 4.5.1 seems much better than 4.4.3 in the Gui department. -- Enrico
