Bo Peng <ben....@gmail.com> writes:
>> Not quite true. In a git world, a bug fixing would _always_ happen in a
>> specific branch and be merged to the main repo when it's done;
>
| This is not that useful if we keep the one developer - one feature
| developing model. Right now, when you work on a feature, all others
| are forced to check it out and test for you. If you use git, your
| feature is unlikely to be well tested (if no one else check out your
| branch) before merge and bigger merges just increase the chance of
| conflict and decrease early review.
This is just bull. You are creating a model that is not optimal and
saying this is due to git.
| IMHO, we do not have enough manpower to use the git model.
There is no such thing as the "git model".
--
Lgb
