>> If this does the job for others, then someone can commit. I won't have >> time until late tonight. > >I have backported it to branch, and I can commit. I'd like to hear Vincent's >opinion first, though, since his approach (removing updateMacro calls) was >quite different.
Well, both should be fixed, the logic in updateLabels is bypassed by this call to updateMacros in setParent. I'm a bit sceptical that someone did the effort to write a FIXME and to change updateLabels according to this, just not to implement a for-loop of one line of code. Why ? Maybe we miss something and we introduce another bug. By the way, doing both like in Richard's patch would always be ok I guess. Vincent
