Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> writes:
> > i think the intention was that $$p is path of the input file
> > not path of the original file.
> >
> > that said i'm not against adding new $$r variable. opinions?
> 
> It would be useful, but I think nevertheless that we should try to think
> about more understandable names. Each function likes to have its own
> variables, and we have no complete vision of this.

so what is your proposal?
pavel

Reply via email to