Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> writes: > > i think the intention was that $$p is path of the input file > > not path of the original file. > > > > that said i'm not against adding new $$r variable. opinions? > > It would be useful, but I think nevertheless that we should try to think > about more understandable names. Each function likes to have its own > variables, and we have no complete vision of this.
so what is your proposal? pavel