On 2008-12-09, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:32:24 +0100 > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Guenter Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > But it might be a good idea to have a "visibility" toggle for all kind >> > of notes (and a matching "high visibility" style for LyX notes in the >> > output). >> Yes, but a 'all is possible' interface (up to "[X] show all footnotes >> except those that contain a math expression" ? :) is risky in terms of >> usability. I heartily agree. However, unifying Notes, Comments and Branches (my first suggestion) would IMO improve the usability of the UI. > You _can_ have a note inside a branch inset BTW. I know, but this would not solve the OP's problem (notes visible to a co-author not using LyX, also see the Subject). However, you can also have a footnote, margin-note or framed box inset in a branch. So it comes back to my first proposal: Instead of a LyX-Note, use a branch for parts of the document that should be optionally visible in the output. This does not require any change to LyX. (It could be made easier by a way to convert Note insets to a "visible" inset, though.) >> Also there is the semantics part. There is a real need for having LyX >> 'skip' some part of text as being 'not there'. For example, notes are >> not part of ToC right now. Inactive branches are 'skipped' just like LyX notes. Günter
