On 18 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Marko Vendelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> |
> | > BTW.: I got a bit out of sync with KDE/GNOME patches as I had to wait
> | > for Lars to have a look at one of them, could you please tell me
> | > (John & Marko) which ones haven't been aplied?
> |
> | Gnome patches are
> |
> | http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg14188.html
>
> The idea is good, but the current way to update the lists is not good
> at all. I tink we will let this be suboptimal for the time beeing and
> leave everything as it is.
What do you mean by "suboptimal"? Is it the basic idea of updating the
list(s) by using buffer()->getTocList() (that means parsing LyX document
for headings etc.) or that it is done after every action and not
during "idle" time?
> Later we (or atleast I want to) have separate insets for headings,
> then it will be easy to emit the signals directly from the buffer when
> headings etc. change.
That would be nice. It should be the same for figures, tables, algorithms
and references too.
Marko
