Pavel Sanda wrote:
just to give some feedback the file/document distinction to me as a user is
quite clear
Can you please (honestly) explain this distinction to me (or define)?
I feel like I am missing something here ...
and adding the items into file menu looks pretty messy.
That is another story.
i hope it won't heat the discussion too much, but the holy-hig-bible position
seems to me as a fraud, because once you start interpret any text, you
will get whatsoever you want.
But this is not what is happening! Nobody else has ever written
something along the lines of "... but I would interpret the HIG such
that ...". Unfortunately. If you should not have noticed yet, I am the
only one seriously talking about any HIG.
the only change is that before you could
honestly say "i don't like document menu" now you cover it behind some
sophisticated arguments.
I really try to avoid any like/dislike - it is always subjective. My
initial long reply to Edwin's email was the result of having his
proposal running, and going line-by-line through the HIG and trying to
follow the HIG as close as possible. That there was nothing left for the
Document-menu was a pure result of that process. Believe it or not, I
have not thought about the Document menu even a single second,
beforehand. I do not think I am hiding behind false arguments here.
that of course doesn't mean we shouldn't emphasize hig, but its another
position than holy book.
Not sure I understand what you want to say with this.
Wondering about your offend,
/Konrad
P.S. On accusing me of fraud / cover up: Have you really worked through
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/110921>
to be able to say so ??? I think it should be enough to support my
claims once with a proper reference, and not repeating the same
citations over and over again within the same thread.
