Leuven, E. wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Leuven, E. wrote:
as i wrote: revert to what is supported
i think that this is a clear and very standard policy
So you want to remove every new feature on reversion? That's the consequence
of "revert to what is _natively_ supported" (your interpretation, if I'm not
mistaken).
yes
If you read it as "revert to what is supported (including ERT support)" (my
interpretation) things look quite different.
ert is a hack, not support imho
this being said, i don't care too much about this reversion stuff myself
You have to, as long as you deal with file format changes.
i meant that in the end i don't care how it looks because i am not a consumer.
so if people think that we should litter the reverted document with ert just
because we can, so be it. but at more conceptual level i think that this is a
perverse result of the possibility of ert.
FWIW, I agree with Edwin.
small note: i am trying to be constructive, not argumentative (one has to be
careful these days ;)
Same here too ;-)
Abdel.
