Leuven, E. wrote: > as i wrote: revert to what is supported > > i think that this is a clear and very standard policy
So you want to remove every new feature on reversion? That's the consequence of "revert to what is _natively_ supported" (your interpretation, if I'm not mistaken). If you read it as "revert to what is supported (including ERT support)" (my interpretation) things look quite different. > this being said, i don't care too much about this reversion stuff myself You have to, as long as you deal with file format changes. Jürgen
