Yes, sorry, it has been fixed, and I have been wrong. I thought, that
I have already sent apology to the list, but nevertheless I am sorry
for causing confusion.
Thanks for care.
Matej
On 5 Sep 00, at 15:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Matej" == Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Matej> What makes me angry is the situation when footnote in list is
> Matej> not translated to direct \footnote construct, but to pair of
> Matej> \footnotemark & \footnotetext, where the text of footnote is
> Matej> put behind the end of the whole list. So, when I have five
> Matej> pages long description of some legal analysis, all footnotes
> Matej> from this list are put five pages ahead. I may be wrong, but I
> Matej> have never found in any piece of documentation any information
> Matej> in the sense, that it is forbidden (or not desirable) to put Matej>
> footnote in a list. Am I wrong or it is really bug?
>
> Hello,
>
> I have not been able to reproduce this problem in 1.1.5fix1. In fact, I
> thought I had fixed that some time ago... Could you send me a short
> example file?
>
> JMarc
>
>
