On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 02:03:23PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hello,
>
> [...]
> > What makes me angry is the situation when footnote in list is not
> > translated to direct \footnote construct, but to pair of \footnotemark
> > & \footnotetext, where the text of footnote is put behind the end of
> > the whole list. So, when I have five pages long description of some
> > legal analysis, all footnotes from this list are put five pages ahead.
>
> This buggy feature is supposed to be disabled by default and has been for
> about 6 months. You are supposed to use to #define FANCY_FOOTNOTE to
> enable it. If the rpm's are doing this by default they are wrong.
They are definitely NOT enabling this by default.
I just checked.
---Kayvan
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan
Sylvan Associates, Inc.
http://www.sylvan.com/~kayvan
