On Saturday 10 May 2008 14:49:42 Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> you are wrong. nothing was released - check annoucement list or news on web
> site. Jose only published tarball to test and since the tests failed,
> nothing was released - except your self-designated win alpha2 snapshot,
> which shouldn't happen and you have been already asked for not doing that
> after your own release of alpha1. i didn't want to pester you again, but
> since you seem not to understand this i couldn't resist now.
Please Pavel,
let us calm down. :-)
Uwe has made an honest effort to follow the rules, and although we have not
officially released an alpha version we have done it in the sense that we (I)
have tagged the release in svn.
Alpha releases are not usually advertised in the users lists and people in
the devel certainly know how to compile from svn.
So an alpha version for windows clearly stating the alpha status was not
adverse to the development.
With that said in the beta release let us go synchronize the binary releases
between the different platforms. OK?
> pavel
Best regards,
PS: Unless someone is opposed, I intend that the next release be the first
beta. Any opposition?
--
José Abílio
