Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Hi all,
This came up on the user list, and I'm wondering if it should go into
bugzilla (and, if so, as a minor bug or as an enhancement). A user
ran into a problem with a math inset in a doc created using the
IEEEtran template. Doing the same thing in a new doc using the
IEEEtran class worked fine, which added to the user's confusion.
Turns out the problem is that File -> New (and setting the class to
IEEEtran) results in automatic AMS math inclusion being turned on; the
IEEEtran template has AMS math turned off. I haven't checked, but the
user says this is also true of other classes.
So the question is, should the templates all have AMS math on, for
consistency and/or to avoid nasty surprises? Bug, enhancement, or
nothing to worry about?
Consistency here would be a good thing, IMO
rh
