Hi all,
This came up on the user list, and I'm wondering if it should go into
bugzilla (and, if so, as a minor bug or as an enhancement). A user ran
into a problem with a math inset in a doc created using the IEEEtran
template. Doing the same thing in a new doc using the IEEEtran class
worked fine, which added to the user's confusion. Turns out the problem
is that File -> New (and setting the class to IEEEtran) results in
automatic AMS math inclusion being turned on; the IEEEtran template has
AMS math turned off. I haven't checked, but the user says this is also
true of other classes.
So the question is, should the templates all have AMS math on, for
consistency and/or to avoid nasty surprises? Bug, enhancement, or
nothing to worry about?
Thanks for any opinions,
Paul
