On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:55:39AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > André, > > you haven broken the compilation again: > > D:\LyXSVN\lyx-devel\src\frontends\qt4\FileDialog.cpp(91) : error C3861: > 'makeAbs > Path': identifier not found > D:\LyXSVN\lyx-devel\src\frontends\qt4\FileDialog.cpp(94) : error C2664: > 'QFileDi > alog::getSaveFileName' : cannot convert parameter 4 from 'const > QStringList' to > 'const QString &' > Reason: cannot convert from 'const QStringList' to 'const QString' > No user-defined-conversion operator available that can perform this > conv > ersion, or the operator cannot be called
That's within #ifdef USE_NATIVE_FILEDIALOG. > You also didn't have updated SCons I do not feel responsible for scons. So far the autotool build chain is the chosen one. If you want scons to take over, make it feature complete. > and also didn't add in changeset/24396 qstring_helpers.cpp > to the makefile. > > André, please take care the LyX is compilable after your changes, you > broke it too often the last time. > > Besides this, we are on the way to stabilize LyX. Are we? I got the impression that after the Richard-vs-Bo episode we have a Joost-vs-Uwe fight coming up (again). > But every "cosmetic" can introduce new problems. I am aware of that. I try not to do that intentionally. > I can understand your compile statistics performance hunting, but why > in this late state of the LyX 1.6 devel cycle? > > I think we need your power for bugfixing to make LyX 1.6.0 ready. > Compile performances can also be done at the beginning of LyX 1.7, or > am I wrong here? Right now it looks like it's not even clear what features make it into 1.6.0. Andre'
