> > Please provide your answer to all questions raised on that thread if > > you are going to endorse Richard's proposal. > > You mean I am not allowing to chime in at all, then? The thread is > quite extensive...
I apologize. I had the impression that you were endorsing Richard's proposal because of this, without thinking of all the drawbacks. > Concerning out-of-tree files, deciding that they should not be bundled > is IMO the cleanest and simplest solution. This gives us a clear model > to work with. Given that a lot of work has been done to make it work, I propose that we add an option ([ ] bundle files not in or under the document directory) that is by default disabled. In this way, we at least allow power users to emded such files. Cheers, Bo
