On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > You mean gnome.ui don't you? Of course you did. Must be nearly lunchtime
> > and you were in a hurry.
>
> Well telling you the truth I just returned from lunch, so no excuse
> for this ;), but I really meant gnome.bind or isn't 'F3' -> file-open
> not a binding?
>
> UI files are only for menus aren't they?
The menus may need to have entries renamed to suit GNOME (or other
desktops) and such. The bindings for the menus are in the .ui files.
So you see gnome.ui is probably the one to work on. There may be other
bindings needed but these aren't likely to be common to other GNOME apps.
Does GNOME specify a binding for the equivalent of "layout standard" for
example?
I thought JMarc wanted to move all the bindings into the ui
file(s). Maybe that was Lars.
I suppose you want GNOME menus with emacs keybindings just to mess things
up further?
> P.S.: Well quite late there did you already have some dinner? #:OP
Thai-style, stir-fried beef with egg noodles.
> One possible reason that things aren't going according to plan
> is that there never was a plan in the first place.
Uh oh! You've found me out!
Allan. (ARRae)
