On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> [snipped the nice explanation]
> >
> > As I said, I'm not trying to be not GUII, I am not dependent on the
> > toolkit, the only things I use are Xpm library and Xlib. That should be
> > independent enough for now. It isn't for Windows or OS/2, but when we get
> > there we'll need to do some more work on Painter.
> >
> > I can't think of everything now, if someone will come up with a new
> > Painter that is GUII (in the broad sense of allowing Windows & OS/2 too),
> > I'll rework my interface to match it and support it, I don't see how I can
> > do all that myself and now.
>
> As Lars already said it is ok and you know that your work is apreciated!
> We just want you to know the general direction now, so later on you're not
> surprised ;)
I do think about GUII but I can't execute all at once, sorry I'm UP
powered.
Thanks for the clarification, but to sum my current it is "experimental"
simply since I'm experimention with the implementation. Hopefully the
experiment will turn good and we'll have a new InsetGraphics. (Actually we
already do, the things now are outside it's direct scope but are used by
it).
--
Baruch Even
http://techst02.technion.ac.il/~sbaruch/ (My Site)
http://rpghost.com/jindor/ (My brothers AD&D site)
" Learn to laugh ... it's the path to true love! "
- The Angel in the movie Michael
