Bernhard Roider wrote:
Pavel Sanda schrieb:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, rgheck wrote:
looking at the RES memory usage, the main consumers are these.
what if
we start by running less childerns of spamd?
59m 2:32.53 spamd 57m 0:52.08 spamd
37m 1:48.72 spamd
Do we even need 'spamd'? I mean, does it serve a useful purpose on
aussie?
i guess its purpose is to filter spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] address and
not doing
this filter would mean megabytes of disk space on aussie every day
because many
people dont forward their mails etc.
shouldn't it be possible to restrict the mailbox size per user?
The worry, I think, is that the mailboxes would fill up with spam in
that case.
As Andre suggested, another option would be to require forwarding, and
then people can sort out their own spam.
rh
