On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:44:59AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, rgheck wrote: > > > > > >>> looking at the RES memory usage, the main consumers are these. > > >>> what if we start by running less childerns of spamd? > > >>> > > >>> 59m 2:32.53 spamd 57m 0:52.08 > > >>> spamd 37m 1:48.72 spamd > > > > > > Do we even need 'spamd'? I mean, does it serve a useful purpose > > > on aussie? > > i guess its purpose is to filter spam from [EMAIL PROTECTED] address and > not doing this filter would mean megabytes of disk space on aussie > every day because many people dont forward their mails etc.
We should just enforce mail forwarding. Andre'
