[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> + if (requires_.empty()) {
> + requires_ = req;
> + break;
> + }
> + for (vector<string>::const_iterator it = req.begin();
> + it != req.end(); ++it) {
> + if (find(requires_.begin(), requires_.end(),
> *it) == requires_.end())
> + requires_.push_back(*it);
> + }
> break;Why is it necessary to handle the requires_.empty() case? What about using some other datastructure like map<string,bool> (there is probably something simpler for a set, though)? JMarc
