> I guess this is where MVC can be useful, but this is outside of my > competency.
I just found that I can set a UserRole for each column, so I can actually store the BindFile format as hidden data. > > 1. I would like to display one binding for each item. That is to say, > > lfun with multiple shortcuts will be displayed as multiple items. I > > know you prefer to put all shortcuts together, but that will make the > > shortcut edit dialog complicated. > > This is indeed the main point. Note that what I propose is like what > KDE does. The shortcut editing dialog would have remove, add, ..., and one of the troubles is that changing lfun there will affect a bunch of shortcuts... > > 5. Remove system shortcut will remove shortcut if this is the only > > shortcut for a lfun, and the whole item if there is anther shortcut. > > (see 3). There will be no revert. > > So there will be no way to revert these kind of modifications? This > does not feel right... If you do not display them, surely you can not revert them. Another proposal is that we display them as separate items, in bold (modified), but without shortcut (removed). And we allow revert. Is it OK to you? (This will also change 2). Bo
