"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This is indeed the main point. Note that what I propose is like what >> KDE does. > > The shortcut editing dialog would have remove, add, ..., and one of > the troubles is that changing lfun there will affect a bunch of > shortcuts...
I do not think it makes sense to change the lfun for a given shortcut, but this is actually the root of our disagreement (list of bindings versus list of actions). >> So there will be no way to revert these kind of modifications? This >> does not feel right... > > If you do not display them, surely you can not revert them. Another > proposal is that we display them as separate items, in bold > (modified), but without shortcut (removed). And we allow revert. Is it > OK to you? (This will also change 2). Except that we do not see what the shortcut used to be (if you have remove two shortcuts for the same function, you cannot guess which is which). JMarc
