On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:34:38AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:03:33AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: > | > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > >Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > > | > >| > As far as I can tell using QtCore in support/*.cpp is acceptable > | > >| > nowadays, so just use QProcess and be done. > | > >| > | > >| also mocing? > | > > > | > >Have I said lately that I really dislike Qt stuff outside Gui stuff? > | > > | > We don't have any advantage of having support Qt free. > | > | I am afraid this is a political or even religiuous debate, not a > | technical one. > > if "lock-in" is technical or political is a debate of its own I guess.
Locked in by the GPL. Sure, that's a problem. That's why we all agreed to it *sigh* Andre'
