Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 11:48:11PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > As far as I can tell using QtCore in support/*.cpp is acceptable
| > | > nowadays, so just use QProcess and be done.
| > |
| > | also mocing?
| >
| > Have I said lately that I really dislike Qt stuff outside Gui stuff?
|
| No.
|
| But I am aware of your opinions.
|
| That does not mean I share it. We go through all sorts of trouble to
| make boost usable within LyX up to bundling the latest and greatest,
| and even that needs to be patched sometimes, and even that causes
| irregular behaviour and bloats compilation. On the other hand, you
| consider Qt not acceptable outside frontends/* without giving reasons
| above a "real dislike".
One of the things I dislike about Qt (in general) is the super slow
adoption of the standard and how it recreates and adds to the standard
with no intention of trying to move the standard closer to what Qt
needs. And with the upcoming new standard I belive that is only likely
to get worse.
OTOH boost have a pretty good track record in this respect, quite a
few of the boost libraries and boost initiated changes will be in the
next version of the standard.
--
Lgb
