Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Right. This was to say: we will obviously never reach an agreement as
our views are fundamentally different.
What we could to try try to resolve this argument is look at what
proper html editors (nvu?) do. They have to deal with the same
problems, don't they?
I am pretty confident that a proper html editor will (or should) do
things the inset way but I never used one to begin with... But that
would be the logical thing to do in order to get nice html output that
does not contain twenty tags per character type.
So either you just accept
current implementation because it is basically done or we revert it
and we replace it with what you, Dov and John come up with using
fonts. If we decide the later, I know for sure that I won't use it and
I will try to implement some kind of macro instead.
Threats already?
No, promise :-)
More seriously, this whole discussion comes a bit late IMHO. I know that
you emitted some objections when Martin started the implementation but
they were not too strong. We have something _now_ and I'd be a pity to
revert it because you and others don't like it.
Abdel.
