Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
But please note that was just a show case to demonstrate the inherent
problem in our current architecture.
Is the fact that LyX should update itself due to external causes so
common that it becomes a fundamental problem?
Are you just trying to avoid the discussion? If not and you genuinely
want to discuss then I'd say yes, basically. This example shows that we
do a lot of things in LyX at the wrong place and at the wrong time. The
fundamental problem is not this little problem, it lies in the design.
The external event could well have been an internal event but it's rare
enough to not notice it.
Abdel.
