> This is nonsense. I do not argue in favour of removing bold, italic and small > caps. However, they should not be visible on top.
But if there is no charstyle equivalence, why not? > > If you hide bold, why do not you hide noun, emph and others? Do > > not tell me they are using charstyles. > > Of course. Noun (!= small caps) and emph (!= italics) are semantic markup, > while bf is not. Now I am confused. The advantage of charstyle is that bold can be \textbf, or anything defined in .layout. If emph is just \em, why is it different from \textbf? I thought that you want to replace emph with CharStyle Emph. > I just do not see the sense in implementing it now for 2 or 3 minor releases. If we made a mistake, we should correct it. This is why we need minor releases. Bo
