Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The attached does this experimentally. It looks good... what we lose is > the possibility to get the previous word automatically into the index > inset. But I suspect there's a trick even for that if we go this way. > > The question is, do we?
Personally, I do not think do. An index is not just yet another collapsable inset. We should decide what UI we want and write the code necessary to get it. Not change the UI so that it fits what we have in store... Are we 100% sure that we will get the right UI? Also, we need to disable font changing inside, right? JMarc
