On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 06:49:34PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Actually have a look at the attached. I somewhat changed my mind since > > the previous reply: what is inside an index inset is real LaTeX, so > > logically it should be a real LyXText. (Yes, there are some limitations > > such as no linebreaks allowed; but you get the idea.) > > Yes, this was the idea. > > > The attached does everything the old index inset does wrt. indexing the > > selection and the previous/surrounding word. And it collapses to a > > really small button, and can be opened by "Open all insets". Which the > > old one did not... > > I like it. > > Jürgen
This requires a lyx2lyx entry, if we change over to this. The next step would be to provide a \see inset that is only valid inside an index entry. It would be good to have a general mechanism for this. (Does this solution lose any functionality wrt. the old one? What other objections are there?) - Martin
