On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:28:27 +0300 Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached does this experimentally. It looks good... what we lose is > the possibility to get the previous word automatically into the index > inset. But I suspect there's a trick even for that if we go this way. > > The question is, do we? > > - Martin > > (Some other rough edges still. It's the idea that counts) Looking at this some more, I have been trying to find the code (for the existing index inset) that does 1) the copying of the word the cursor is in to inside the inset, and 2) the copying of the selection, if there is any. I don't see it. Am I dumb (no, don't answer that) - Martin
