On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | PS:
> |
> | > - bool const empty() const
> | > + bool empty() const
> | > {
> | > return data_.empty();
> | > }
> |
> | So gcc starts complaining about the first 'const'? Nice.
>
> Not all "first 'const'" though. Only for basic types it seems.
Probably because it makes a difference for those.
In any case, I do not like the const for non-basic types as well.
Line noise without real good reason.
Andre'
