Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > The behaviour of M-Return is the exact symmetry of what Return would > do:
I see. I'm fine with that (though I still prefer the old behaviour, i.e. swap Return and M-Return). > Actually, it could be renamed to something like > break-paragraph-special, or an 'inverse' option could be added to > break-paragraph. Yes, the current name is certainly misleading. I would prefer to merge the two lfuns and add an option (I don't like "inverse". How about "parentlayout"?). > I am not sure that I want to apply the patch for 1.5.2 actually. I > would like to tinker with it a bit more: when typing Return (or > M-Return) in an empty paragraph (with keepempty not set), we should > use the procedure described for Return/command to decrease the depth. > This would allow to go out of nested enumeration by successive > pressing of Return. I'm not sure I like this. Why should we double the functionality of depth-decrement? Anyway, I would be fine with this patch. You can apply if you like. Jürgen
