[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> The behaviour of M-Return is the exact symmetry of what Return would >> do: > > I see. I'm fine with that (though I still prefer the old behaviour, i.e. swap > Return and M-Return).
Could you be more precise? I do not think the behaviour of Return has been changed recently. What would you like to see? > I'm not sure I like this. Why should we double the functionality of > depth-decrement? Currently, pressing Return on an empty paragraph does nothing. The idea is for example, at the end of an enumeration, one types return twice and LyX is back to top level standard style. JMarc
