On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 12:34:07PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:46:52AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Darren Freeman wrote: > > > In which case maybe we can accept the words (broken) or (bugs) or (see > > > docs) in the 1.5.x menu items? > > > > No. > > > > Jürgen > > I seem to remember once proposing to throw this whole > (mis-)feature behind the rhododendrons... just because > time/life/newsweek does it, doesn't make it good typography.
Why waste the entire page width when some figure is thin? Do you consider wrapped figures apalling typography in all cases? I though dropping the feature might be the right thing to do given the useless floatflt implementation, but wrapfig seems to do a better job. Helge Hafting
