On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 12:34:07PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:46:52AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > > Darren Freeman wrote: > > > > In which case maybe we can accept the words (broken) or (bugs) or (see > > > > docs) in the 1.5.x menu items? > > > > > > No. > > > > > > Jürgen > > > > I seem to remember once proposing to throw this whole > > (mis-)feature behind the rhododendrons... just because > > time/life/newsweek does it, doesn't make it good typography. > > Why waste the entire page width when some figure is thin? > Do you consider wrapped figures apalling typography in all cases?
No, but I have seen very few examples of good use. > I though dropping the feature might be the right thing to do given > the useless floatflt implementation, but wrapfig seems to > do a better job. If it really is, then OK. But there still should be something in the manual about it. > Helge Hafting - Martin
