On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:42:27 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
... > Sure and I also count on you to remind those ;-) I am sure any drawing problem > will be detected in time and corrected before 1.6.0. I hope you don't mind me > ripping out this code but I really think this should be done now, early in the > development cycle. I didn't do it in the previous devel series because of > insufficient knowledge (which I have now). You are very welcome to help me in > the design and coding :-) Yes, if you do it, do it now. I believe drawing can be very efficient if designed with parsimony from the ground up. > > This CRC thing was at the time considered rather a kludge ;-/ > > I know a lot more things in the code that are much more of a kludge. The CRC > is > quite OK in my opinion. We could also replace that with a Paragraph::changed() > status but I am not going to do that now. Surely you mean Row::changed()? Would make sense. You would need to detect 1) has the metric (dim) changed? 2) has the position on-screen (x,y) changed? 3) has the appearance (text, font, other visible attributes like CT) changed? - Martin
