"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think improving the already existing (and fairly improvable) >> spellchecker is more important than adding a new one. > > The general idea is to implement a mechanism to return hints for > partial or full words. The major features in mind are > completion-on-demand (search existing text, no user configuration is > required) and abbreviation (replace using predefined abbreviation > list). Spell-hint can be easily fitted into this framework but is at a > lower priority.
I think what you have in mind is not spellchecker related. Is there really a need for fitting spell checkers in there? JMarc
