Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> We _do_not_ introduce new uses of Inset::xxx_CODE.
>
> Are you reading? This is the old code! I am actually proposing to
> remove this use of Inset::xxx_CODE.

Sorry. I got it wrong. Implementing cell() is indeed a good idea. This
should also imply, as you mention, looking at other methods (also
inDocIterator) that produce similar information and try to make a
sense at them.

Historically, in this Inset and DocIterator code, different place sof
the code have added different ways of doing things and it shows.

> I think your opinion on me alter your judgment.

Maybe. But I am tired too, it gets on my nerve :)

JMarc

Reply via email to