Bo Peng wrote:
Right now, if I may summarize the opinion of the lead developers: you
will have to rebase all your work on trunk step by step, logical change
by logical change. It's obviously a waste of time and most of the time
invested in your branch is basically lost. I will discourage anyone
trying to work in branch.
That is part of the reason why I do not use branches. I simply work
locally, and keep my tree up to date using 'svn up'.
Yes, though, if fixing a bug modifies a file I'm working on otherwise,
then I can have a problem.
When a feature is ready, I will generate a big patch for review. If the patch
is too
big, I am willing to split it by functionally separated parts.
It's how to do this last bit that I'm curious about.
Richard
--
==================================================================
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
==================================================================
Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de
Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC
Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at:
http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
