Michael Gerz wrote:
José Matos schrieb:
On Friday 20 July 2007 10:34:38 Michael Gerz wrote:
IMHO 14 parameters are enough. Don't you think that a container like
OutputParams is the better solution?
Michael
But not OutputParams. OutputParams are parameters used to control the
output, as I said before you want something like OutputState.
OutputParams are the public interface and OutputState would be the
private interface, there is no need to mix the two even if it seems
convenient.
So you want me to create a new OutputState class for the two new flags,
right? We might also want to add some existing parameters to the new
container, too.
Please note that even with this class, it might be beneficial to
distinguish between parameters that are passed "down" and those that are
passed "up" and "down".
Just to make sure: Is OutputState 1.5.X stuff or would you (and Jürgen)
be willing with a temporary fix like the one posted before and find an
elegant solution for 1.6.0?
Michael
It seems to me that this will require major reworking in the future (see
my half-baked ideas in
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/90237), so we might
as well use the current patch for now...?
Dov
- Re: [PATCH] CT output (again) Dov Feldstern
-
