Re: LyX version numbering change proposal

[Lars Gullik Bjønnes]

Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| > 
| >| In the proposed method we will simply have
| >| 1.2.x for the the stable and 1.3.x for the development, with backports to
| >| update the older version, the transition will be to rename 1.1.6 to 1.2.0
| >| when the time comes for its release and the new devel version will be
| >| 1.3.0.
| > 
| > You need to read a bit in the old mail-archive.
| > (short: we used to do it like this...gave us too long development
| > cycles)
| 
| I really don't understand why this should give longer developement series???
| We just work as now, and only on release we change the version number and
| then we can release fixes as 1.2.x instead of 1.1.6fixXXX, just a mean of
| numbering no change of policy, please tell me if I'm wrong and maybe the
| numbering scheme makes some of us work slower :)

So you want to just skip all odds then, as a way to fool people that
this is a stable release.

        Lgb