Re: LyX version numbering change proposal

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Juergen> On 22-Jun-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 
>> | release it that way. We just reaname 1.1.6 to 1.2.0 on release
>> and then the | new cvs will be 1.3.0 and if we release this it will
>> be 1.4.0 fixes are | released by the last number!
>> 
>> I_say no.
>> 
>> What I could agree on is:
>> 
>> z.y.0cvs is development for z.y.0 z.y.0preX is prerelease of z.y.0
>> z.y.0 is a release z.y.x is fixes to the release
>> 

Juergen> Well we are a democrazy so what do other CORE developers say
Juergen> about this?

That's fine with me. We are not ready to release 2.0 soon, so we have
to many numbers in our versions.

However, this time, we will need someone to audit all the doc and the
web sites and update it, to avoid all the confusion.

And we should all promise to stick to the rule: "minor releases do not
have new features".

JMarc