On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:14:44PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
>
> Am 12.06.2007 um 14:47 schrieb Leuven, E.:
>
> >ctrl-n
> >ctrl-m
> >\neq
> >arrow right (exit math)
> >arrow left (enter math again)
> >
> >and i don't see the neq sign but \ =
>
> I can confirm that. Please make a bug report out of it.
Seems like width computation assumes w >= 0 somewhere.
Btw can anybody explain me how stuff like
//BufferView & bv = *mi.base.bv;
//Buffer const & buf = *bv.buffer();
for (size_t i = 0, n = size(); i != n; ++i) {
MathAtom const & at = operator[](i);
#if 0
MathMacro const * mac = at->asMacro();
if (mac && buf.hasMacro(mac->name())) {
MacroData const & tmpl = buf.getMacro(mac->name());
int numargs = tmpl.numargs();
if (i + numargs > n)
numargs = n - i - 1;
lyxerr << "metrics:found macro: " << mac->name()
<< " numargs: " << numargs << endl;
if (!isInside(bv.cursor(), *this, i + 1, i + numargs +
1)) {
MathData args(begin() + i + 1, begin() + i +
numargs + 1);
MathData exp;
tmpl.expand(args, exp);
mac->setExpansion(exp, args);
mac->metricsExpanded(mi, d);
dim_.wid += mac->widthExpanded();
i += numargs;
continue;
}
}
#endif
at->metrics(mi, d);
can end up in MathData.cpp?
This is certainly not the bit bucket of the nation....
The whole business around rev 17836 and 17840 looks dubious at best.
Andre'
