On Monday 21 May 2007 15:43:12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > José> configure:9993: checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti > José> -fno-exceptions configure:10011: gcc -c -g -O -Wextra -Wall > José> -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions conftest.c >&5 cc1: warning: command > José> line option "-fno-rtti" is valid for C++/ObjC++ but not for C > José> configure:10015: $? = 0 configure:10026: result: no > > The question is why configure picks gcc instead of g++, then. Or why > the file is conftest.c and not conftest.C.
It seems that gcc is becoming more picky (/precise) about the options that are passed. The compiler is right this options does not make sense. As far as my investigations goes it shows that this worked for Red Hat Linux 9 (gcc 3.2.2) but it failed for FC3 (gcc 3.4.2). Not sure if it is worth investigating... > JMarc -- José Abílio
