>>>>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Monday 21 May 2007 15:43:12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: José> configure:9993: checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti José> -fno-exceptions configure:10011: gcc -c -g -O -Wextra -Wall José> -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions conftest.c >&5 cc1: warning: command José> line option "-fno-rtti" is valid for C++/ObjC++ but not for C José> configure:10015: $? = 0 configure:10026: result: no >> The question is why configure picks gcc instead of g++, then. Or >> why the file is conftest.c and not conftest.C. José> It seems that gcc is becoming more picky (/precise) about the José> options that are passed. The compiler is right this options does José> not make sense. José> As far as my investigations goes it shows that this worked for José> Red Hat Linux 9 (gcc 3.2.2) but it failed for FC3 (gcc 3.4.2). José> Not sure if it is worth investigating... No because I think it does not change anything. Libtool is junk. JMarc
